Copyright Board |
|
Commission du droit d’auteur |
[CB-CDA 2023-058]
ORDER OF THE BOARD
Proceeding: Online Audiovisual Services - Music (2014-2026)
November 24, 2023
[1] I will hold a case conference in the Online Audiovisual Services-Music (2014-2026) proceeding.
[2] The Parties that have confirmed their participation in this proceeding are listed in Annex A. Given the Parties’ responses, this proceeding will be in English.
Issues to Discuss at Case Conference
[3] The purpose of the case conference is to establish the initial steps in this proceeding. The issues that parties should be ready to address include the following:
1. Will SOCAN and SODRAC act as one party or two?
2. The role of objectors and interveners, particularly in view of Order 2017-153.
[4] First, I am of the preliminary view that I should maintain the portion of Order 2017-153 that restricts objectors from acting in relation to a family of proposed tariffs to which they had not objected.
[5] Furthermore, while Order 2017-153 invited parties to seek intervener status with full participatory rights, I note that I will consider the factors in Rule 52(5) in determining whether any such request is sufficiently justified.
3. The Schedule of Proceedings
[6] A preliminary calendar is included in Annex B for Parties’ comment during the case conference.
[7] Because
- there are variations in scope, rates, and terms and conditions among the proposed tariffs within each of the four tariff families under consideration in this proceeding (SOCAN 22.D.1; SOCAN 22.D.2; SODRAC 6 – SOCAN 22.A.R; and SODRAC 7 – SOCAN 22.D.1.R), and
- various portions of the proposed tariffs have been carved out of this proceeding (e.g., online allied services, online music video services),
I believe that the Board and the Parties would benefit from consolidated tariff texts for each tariff family. In the past, such consolidated texts have sometimes been referred to as a Request for Certification (RFC) or Request for Approval (RFA). As such, I am of the preliminary view that collectives should file a Request for Approval for each of the proposed tariff families.
[8] I am also of the preliminary view that parties should file both Notices of Grounds for Proposed Tariffs, as well Notices of Grounds for Objections. The Notices of the Grounds for Proposed Tariffs would accompany, and be in relation to, the Requests for Approval (i.e., per proposed tariff family). These would assist the Parties in developing a Joint Statement of Issues and assist me in developing an appropriate schedule for the remainder of the proceeding.
[9] Last, I have previously mentioned that in my view, this proceeding would benefit from being handled in two phases. The first phase would consider only those issues that require little or no interrogatories, and are expected to have a significant bearing on the remainder of the proceeding, such as by limiting the scope of further interrogatories.
[10] Therefore, the Parties’ Joint Statement of Issues would not only need to identify issues for the Board to consider, but also indicate which of these issues they believe should be determined in a first phase and why.
[11] As a reminder, I have previously indicated in Order 2023-001 that the following issues may be appropriate to consider in a first phase:
- the applicability of CBC v. SODRAC to this proceeding;
- the effect of s. 29.21 of the Copyright Act on intermediaries; and
- the model to determine the effect of reproduction exceptions on royalty rates.
4. Any other procedural issues the Parties wish to bring to my attention.
[12] Finally, if a Party intends to raise any procedural issues other than the ones mentioned in this order at the case management conference, it shall provide the Board and other Parties a brief description of those issues by no later than Monday, December 11, 2023.
Case Conference Scheduling
[13] I will be available for the case conference on Monday, December 18, 2023 and Tuesday, December 19, 2023 between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.
[14] The case conference is expected to last 2 hours (with a 10-minute break) and will be held virtually.
[15] Taking this into consideration, Parties shall discuss amongst themselves and propose a date and time that are convenient for all.
[16] Parties shall inform me of the date and time selected by no later than Friday, December 1st, 2023.
Nathalie Théberge
Case Manager
ANNEX A: List of Parties and Roles
Party
|
Role
|
SOCAN
|
Collective
|
SODRAC
|
Collective
|
Apple Inc. and Apple Canada Inc.
|
Objectors
|
Bell Canada
|
Objector
|
Canadian Association of Broadcasters
|
Objector
|
Canadian Communication Systems Alliance
|
Objector
|
Cogeco Communications Inc.
|
Objector
|
DAZN
|
Objector
|
Goodlife Fitness Centres Inc.
|
Objector
|
Google Inc.
|
Objector
|
Meta Platforms Inc.
|
Objector
|
Motion Picture Association – Canada
|
Objector
|
Netflix Inc.
|
Objector
|
Quebecor Media Inc.
|
Objector
|
Rogers Communications Canada Inc.
|
Objector
|
Stingray Digital Group Inc.
|
Objector
|
Telus Communications Inc.
|
Objector
|
TikTok Technology Canada Inc.
|
Objector
|
Warner Bros.
|
Objector
|
ANNEX B: Preliminary Calendar
Who
|
What
|
Date
|
Collective(s)
|
File Requests for Approval and corresponding Notices of Grounds
|
March 29, 2024
|
Objectors
|
File Notices of Grounds for Objection
|
April 30, 2024
|
Collective(s)
|
File Responses to Objectors
|
May 31, 2024
|
Board
|
Issues directions on Joint Statement of Issues
|
July 15, 2024
|
Collective(s) and Objectors
|
File Joint Statement of Issues
|
August 30, 2024
|
Intervener
|
Files Additional Issues
|
September 16, 2024
|
Collective(s) and Objectors
|
Respond to Intervener
|
September 30, 2024
|
Board
|
Finalizes List of Issues and Rules on Phases
|
November 15, 2024
|
All
|
Case Conference on scheduling remaining steps
|
November 30, 2024
|