Notices, Orders and Rulings

Decision Information

Decision Content

Copyright Board
Canada

Canada Coat of Arms/Armoiries du Canada

Commission du droit d’auteur
Canada

 

[CB-CDA 2023-058]

 

ORDER OF THE BOARD

 

Proceeding: Online Audiovisual Services - Music (2014-2026)

November 24, 2023

 

[1] I will hold a case conference in the Online Audiovisual Services-Music (2014-2026) proceeding.

[2] The Parties that have confirmed their participation in this proceeding are listed in Annex A. Given the Parties’ responses, this proceeding will be in English.

Issues to Discuss at Case Conference

[3] The purpose of the case conference is to establish the initial steps in this proceeding. The issues that parties should be ready to address include the following:

1. Will SOCAN and SODRAC act as one party or two?

2. The role of objectors and interveners, particularly in view of Order 2017-153.

[4] First, I am of the preliminary view that I should maintain the portion of Order 2017-153 that restricts objectors from acting in relation to a family of proposed tariffs to which they had not objected.

[5] Furthermore, while Order 2017-153 invited parties to seek intervener status with full participatory rights, I note that I will consider the factors in Rule 52(5) in determining whether any such request is sufficiently justified.

3. The Schedule of Proceedings

[6] A preliminary calendar is included in Annex B for Parties’ comment during the case conference.

[7] Because

- there are variations in scope, rates, and terms and conditions among the proposed tariffs within each of the four tariff families under consideration in this proceeding (SOCAN 22.D.1; SOCAN 22.D.2; SODRAC 6 – SOCAN 22.A.R; and SODRAC 7 – SOCAN 22.D.1.R), and

- various portions of the proposed tariffs have been carved out of this proceeding (e.g., online allied services, online music video services),

I believe that the Board and the Parties would benefit from consolidated tariff texts for each tariff family. In the past, such consolidated texts have sometimes been referred to as a Request for Certification (RFC) or Request for Approval (RFA). As such, I am of the preliminary view that collectives should file a Request for Approval for each of the proposed tariff families.

[8] I am also of the preliminary view that parties should file both Notices of Grounds for Proposed Tariffs, as well Notices of Grounds for Objections. The Notices of the Grounds for Proposed Tariffs would accompany, and be in relation to, the Requests for Approval (i.e., per proposed tariff family). These would assist the Parties in developing a Joint Statement of Issues and assist me in developing an appropriate schedule for the remainder of the proceeding.

[9] Last, I have previously mentioned that in my view, this proceeding would benefit from being handled in two phases. The first phase would consider only those issues that require little or no interrogatories, and are expected to have a significant bearing on the remainder of the proceeding, such as by limiting the scope of further interrogatories.

[10] Therefore, the Parties’ Joint Statement of Issues would not only need to identify issues for the Board to consider, but also indicate which of these issues they believe should be determined in a first phase and why.

[11] As a reminder, I have previously indicated in Order 2023-001 that the following issues may be appropriate to consider in a first phase:

- the applicability of CBC v. SODRAC to this proceeding;

- the effect of s. 29.21 of the Copyright Act on intermediaries; and

- the model to determine the effect of reproduction exceptions on royalty rates.

4. Any other procedural issues the Parties wish to bring to my attention.

[12] Finally, if a Party intends to raise any procedural issues other than the ones mentioned in this order at the case management conference, it shall provide the Board and other Parties a brief description of those issues by no later than Monday, December 11, 2023.

Case Conference Scheduling

[13] I will be available for the case conference on Monday, December 18, 2023 and Tuesday, December 19, 2023 between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.

[14] The case conference is expected to last 2 hours (with a 10-minute break) and will be held virtually.

[15] Taking this into consideration, Parties shall discuss amongst themselves and propose a date and time that are convenient for all.

[16] Parties shall inform me of the date and time selected by no later than Friday, December 1st, 2023.

 

Nathalie Théberge

Case Manager


 


 

ANNEX A: List of Parties and Roles

 


Party

Role

SOCAN

Collective

SODRAC

Collective

Apple Inc. and Apple Canada Inc.

Objectors

Bell Canada

Objector

Canadian Association of Broadcasters

Objector

Canadian Communication Systems Alliance

Objector

Cogeco Communications Inc.

Objector

DAZN

Objector

Goodlife Fitness Centres Inc.

Objector

Google Inc.

Objector

Meta Platforms Inc.

Objector

Motion Picture Association – Canada

Objector

Netflix Inc.

Objector

Quebecor Media Inc.

Objector

Rogers Communications Canada Inc.

Objector

Stingray Digital Group Inc.

Objector

Telus Communications Inc.

Objector

TikTok Technology Canada Inc.

Objector

Warner Bros.

Objector

 


 

ANNEX B: Preliminary Calendar

Who

What

Date

Collective(s)

File Requests for Approval and corresponding Notices of Grounds

March 29, 2024

Objectors

File Notices of Grounds for Objection

April 30, 2024

Collective(s)

File Responses to Objectors

May 31, 2024

Board

Issues directions on Joint Statement of Issues

July 15, 2024

Collective(s) and Objectors

File Joint Statement of Issues

August 30, 2024

Intervener

Files Additional Issues

September 16, 2024

Collective(s) and Objectors

Respond to Intervener

September 30, 2024

Board

Finalizes List of Issues and Rules on Phases

November 15, 2024

All

Case Conference on scheduling remaining steps

November 30, 2024

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.