Proposed Tariffs

Decision Information

Decision Content

Buena Vista International, Inc. “Disney”: Notice of Grounds for Objection CMRRA Audiovisual Services (2025-2027) (“Proposed Tariff”) December 14, 2023

1. Grounds for why the Board should not approve the proposed tariff despite any alteration of royalties or levies or fixation of terms or conditions.

N/A.

2. Grounds for objecting to any royalty or levy rates in the proposed tariff. Disney objects to the royalty structure of the Proposed Tariff, which is a combination of a percentage of revenue, fee per file or fee per subscriber per month.

The proposed royalty amounts that would be payable under the Proposed Tariff are excessive relative to the value of the music used, whether considered at the level of percent of revenue, fee per subscriber, fee per play, or as proposed, a combination of these factors.

The Proposed Tariff’s structure and the proposed royalty rates are not sensitive to many circumstances of Disney audiovisual service that must reduce the amount of any royalties that are payable under the tariff. These include:

1) Disney has, and continues to clear, a wide range of the necessary reproduction rights for musical works at the time of acquisition or production of content, and thus does not require all rights for all CMRRA works under the Proposed Tariff; 2) Most reproductions in connection with Disney’s audiovisual service are made outside of Canada; 3) Many of the reproductions made inside Canada are covered by various exceptions under the Copyright Act; and 4) CMRRA’s repertoire represents only a portion of the musical works that Disney may reproduce in Canada.

3. Grounds for objecting to any terms or conditions in the proposed tariff. Disney objects to the Proposed Tariff that contains overly onerous and over-inclusive reporting terms to the prejudice of Disney. For example, the Proposed Tariff could require Disney to provide music end-use information and cue sheet data on files for which Disney does not need to rely on the Proposed Tariff for reproduction rights. Moreover, any reporting is subject to CMRRA’s audit rights, and services are required preserve all records for a certain duration of time, despite the potential for limited reliance on rights under the Proposed Tariff as described above.

1

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.